Support indigenous communities sharing their stories through their voices.
The Project Tree is one of the primary resources provided to partner communities. Symbolizing our project processes with a plant ensures a relatable analogy for communities around the world.
Select Each Arrow on the Right
An intensive process of ensuring protections, accuracy, and ethical research practices must be carried out by IRP prior to engaging with potential partner communities/narrators
Pre-Assessment
Involves reviewing relevant anthropological literature and seeking expert opinions on the following topics
Personal Reflections - IRP Positionality, Power Dynamic, and Intent
Questions/Concerns - The following categories are thoroughly analyzed and reviewed for each potential project:
Harm - What traumas, misrepresentations, or dangers might develop as a result of IRP's involvement?
Interviewer/Organizational Limitations - What concrete, logistical obstacles may inhibit IRP's ability to support a project through Phase V?
Purpose: Will the research empower, support, and/or preserve in accordance in community needs?
Mutual Beneficence/Community Support - Does the work serve both the partner community as well as IRP's Mission and Vision?
Pre-Permission
Inquiry with Communities - Initial contact with potential partner communities presents the pre-assessment to community leaders and liaisons such as local museums or organizations
Feedback provided by potential partners will focus on:
Methodology
Timeline
Results/Final Product
Compensation
Outreach and Relations
Partnership formation founded in the principles of Humility and Gratitude
Clear communication with communities exploring what Empowerment means and looks like to partner communities themselves
Mutual Benefit
Global archive of invaluable indigenous human history
Community preservation & awareness
Protections
Investigation of potential conflicts, dangers, and harassment
Narrator/Community considerations
Partnered dialogue focuses on potential for harm or trauma to:
Narrator & Network
Community
Interviewer
Institutional/Individual Support (click for further information) - Relevant local and international museums, nonprofits, or other organizations may partner with IRP projects for the purpose(s) of:
Anonymity assurances
Cultural liaising
Language & translation of documents and interview(s)
Translator determined by narrators
Interview/Record Planning: IRP's Project Tree (see diagram above)
Roots - The foundational building blocks in IRP’s rapport building initiatives:
Mutual Understanding - The following categories are considered according to community priorities and culture:
Terminology - Culturally appropriate meanings must be carefully discussed to ensure significant vocabulary used by either IRP or Narrators
Purpose of project and oral history role
Methodology: processes & logistics
Funding Information
Who, Why, Where?
Trunk - Necessary pillars strengthening the research, partnership, and final product(s)
Privacy and Access
Narrator access to interview and related materials
3rd party access permissions
Shared/Participatory Power and Rolling Consent
Deed of Gift - Ensures community ownership and IRP stewardship of oral history and folk music productions
Potential cross-cultural considerations facilitate accurate communication and ethical contractual agreements
Cooperative Fundamentals for each IRP Project
Co-constructed consent forms
Automatic shared copyright
Co-determined interview usage (reconfirm Pre-Permissions from Phase I)
Co-created access levels (Community-centered)
Co-admittance to all interview data for narrators/communities
Checks and Balances
Changes to consent at narrator’s request
Can occur as a consequence of miscommunication during Phase I or early in Phase II
Partner communities determine the frequency of reassessing consent permissions
Crown - Final Products & Major Events
Film & Album Premieres
Purpose of event
Use and diffusion of research
Outcomes must be considered prior to commencing production
Unintended dangers/challenges
Preservation
Short/Long term community access
Interviews/Recordings
Translated documents provided to narrators and communities prior to and during interview sessions:
Glossary of terms
List of questions
Primary and secondary contact information for IRP
Assurance that segments with vulnerable information can be removed or withheld at narrator’s request
Post-Interviews / Recordings - Facilitates a comprehensive mutual process of accurate interpretation
Narrator review and approval of all interview notes
Consideration of interviewer’s presumptions and assertions
Preservation
Decisions regarding preservation and archiving should be made during the Protections process of Roots Phase II and revisited again here during Trunk Production Phase III
Following the interviews, all previously made decisions are confirmed with narrators and community leaders
Review access policies with narrators and community leaders
Assure fluidity of rights per narrators’ needs
Interpretation
Final Product Review - Narrator/Community-Centered
Exhibition Platforms - Where the research is exhibited must be considered to assess if any further audience guidance or explanations may be necessary.
Online, Film Festivals, Libraries, Universities and Schools, None
Multi-layered Archiving - Security and accessibility analyzed cooperatively with narrator(s)/community
Digital & Physical
Location - Where will transcripts, community information, and research related documents be stored?
Duration - How long will all relevant material be stored?
Finances - What is the source of funding the storage of research materials?
Community
If desired and viable, the partner community will retain a copy of all materials for their personal and local records
Protective Considerations
Clear, accurate, and empathic communication with potential patner communities regarding:
Restrictions (Locations of exhibition, Time)
Digital Firewalls
Pseudonyms
Providing legal assistance
No Protections Guaranteed*
Sustained Relationships
IRP Branches
Indigenous Roots Productions offers all partners the opportunity to join a network of IRP Branches Members. These include all communities and organizations who have participated in projects and wish to continue collaborating as a collective.
Launch final product(s)
Community organized events, film premieres, concerts, media and publicity
Review archival information
Final community assessment on research integrity and long-term security
Ensure all agreed upon proceeds or compensation continue to reach narrators and communities
Maintain communication on matters of protection and community concerns
Provide opportunities for future projects pending narrator needs and intentions
IRP Community Vine
Partner communities who wish to join IRP's network of project partners will have the opportunity to engage with other IRP partner communities for the purposes of:
Fellowship & solidarity
Shared knowledge
Mutual Beneficence in accordance with each community's wishes
Header Image: Mayan hieroglyphic pictographs at Chichen Itza in the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico. Written communication like these were of the first method used to document prehistoric oral tradition.